If the Shipowner can only show that some part of the damage to the goods was due to a cause within the exception, he must also show how much of the damage is comprised in that part, otherwise he is liable ________ .
A.for the part
B.for the whole
C.for the parts of damage not due to causes within the exception
D.for the parts of damage due to causes within the exception
第1题:
If it is clear that the damage must have arisen either from bad stowage or from perils of the sea,and are excepted,in order to escape liability the Shipowner must show that the damage arose from the latter.“the latter”refers to ______
A.the Shipowner
B.bad stowage
C.perils of the sea
D.the shipper
第2题:
Owners are to be responsible for loss of or damage to the goods or delay in delivery of the goods only in case the loss,damage or delay has been caused by the improper or negligent stowage of the goods.This means that ______.
A.Owners are to be responsible for loss or damage even such loss or damage is not caused by the improper stowage
B.Owners are only responsible for the loss or damage or delay caused by improper or negligent stowage.
C.Both A and B are right
D.Both A and B are wrong
第3题:
材料:
Some older decisions have held that the carrier,in order to rebut the presumption of liability resulting from the arrival in damaged condition of GOODs shipped undamaged,must prove not only that the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils,but also that the harm did not result from any negligence on the carrier&39;s part.
Most more recent decisions and authors,however,uphold the view that,in general,the carrier may rebut the claimant&39;s prima facie case simply by proving that the loss was caused by an excepted peril.At that point,the onus switches to the cargo claimant to prove that the true cause of the loss was the carrier&39;s negligence.
Nevertheless certain Hague and Hague/Visby Rules exceptions,expressly or implicitly,also require the carrier to negative its own negligence in proving the exception itself.For example,a clause in the said rules expressly imposes on the carrier the burden of proving that the loss or damage occurred without its actual fault or privity and without any fault or neglect on the part of its servants or agents.
The carrier,however,must truly prove the existence of one or more of the exceptions and their causative role in respect of the loss or damage.Conjectures and speculation do not take the place of hard evidence.A court has held:“Mere speculation will not overcome the prima facie evidence of a clean bill of lading”.
问题:
The carrier will be held liable for the loss or damage if _______.
A.it is proved that he has privity to the loss or damage
B.it is proved that the fault or neglect on his part is not the true cause of the loss or damage
C.it is too onerous for him to demonstrate that the loss or damage is caused by what is beyond his control
D.if there are conjectures and speculation
In accordance with old decisions,the carrier will not be excused unless he has proved that _______.A.not only the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils,but also that the harm did not result from any negligence on the his part
B.the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils
C.the harm did not result from any negligence on his part
D.there are conjectures and speculation
In accordance with most more recent decisions and authors,the carrier will not be excused unless he has proved that _______.A.not only the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils,but also that the harm did not result from any negligence on the his part
B.the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils
C.the harm did not result from any negligence on his part
D.there are conjectures and speculation
It is concluded that _______.A.The carrier is not in a position to prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils
B.It can not be decided that whether the carrier has to prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils because there are some differences between the decisions and authors and requirements of Hague and Hague/Visby Rules
C.The carrier does not have to prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils due to the fact that there are some differences between the decisions and authors and requirements of Hague and Hague/Visby Rules
D.The carrier must truly prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils even there are some differences between the decisions and authors and requirements of Hague and Hague/Visby Rules
请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析,谢谢!
第4题:
with
on
for
by
第5题:
does
did
does not
will not
第6题:
is
makes
has
takes
第7题:
pay
be paying
have paid
be paid
第8题:
The carrier
The Shipowner
The carrier or the Shipowner
Neither the carrier nor the Shipowner
第9题:
made
taken
gotten
given
第10题:
attack
attach
attain
attend
第11题:
taken
be exercised
be done
be had
第12题:
the Shipowner
bad stowage
perils of the sea
the shipper
第13题:
If the ship cannot finish the voyage,the Shipowner must forward the goods by some other means ______ his claim to freight is lost.
A.then
B.and
C.when
D.or
第14题:
Unless the Shipowner carries the goods to the destination agreed on,he ______ entitled to any part of the freight.
A.is
B.has
C.is not
D.has not
第15题:
delays due to seizure of the vessel
fire caused by fault of the carrier
strikes or lockouts
improper stowage
第16题:
realized
practiced
maintained
exercised
第17题:
either
the master
the Shipowner
neither
第18题:
want
send
deliver
claim
第19题:
Owners are to be responsible for loss or damage even such loss or damage is not caused by the improper stowage
Owners are only responsible for the loss or damage or delay caused by improper or negligent stowage
Both A and B are right
Both A and B are wrong
第20题:
STCW
IMDG
SOLAS
The contract or the statute
第21题:
act of God
peril of the sea
queen's enemies
inherent vice in the goods
第22题:
then
and
when
or
第23题:
ensure the fitness and safety of cargo spaces
ensure adequate packaging of the cargo
prevent delays due to quarantine restrictions
correct all defects in the ship's construction